Reviewers, please address the following questions when reviewing the submission:
What are the author(s) trying to accomplish? Who is their primary audience? How have they made their goals clear? In what ways have they succeeded? What do they still need to do?
How does the project contribute to the various fields in which it participates? How does it reinforce or depart from current disciplinary conversations? How can the project be strengthened in this area?
Does the project make full affordances of multimedia and/or interactivity in its design? That is, in what ways does the form/design of this project make it a good fit for CCDP? What kinds of technical changes need to be made in order to ready the emerging text for publication? What are its strengths? How would you describe your response to the text's relationship between form and content overall?
Are the use of moving and/or still images, as well as audio and graphics, effective and appropriate for the text? What recommendations, if any, would you make to the author(s)? How do you expect this digital production to be received by CCDP readers/viewers?
Is the work inclusive in terms of contributor representation, how its audience is addressed, and citations? Do you feel the manuscript has engaged diverse voices and considered perspectives beyond a limited view? Can you suggest ways in which the manuscript can better do that work?
What is your overall recommendation?
a) Publish (i.e., after final cleanup or copyedit; no need for revision)
b) Publish with minor revisions (as suggested in the attached review)
c) Revise and Resubmit (substantial revisions needed). A decision of Revise and Resubmit will likely require the work to be sent out for additional peer review once revised.
d) Reject (revision unmerited or unlikely to be successful)
What recommendations and suggestions would you make to the editors at this point? We would appreciate any other comments you might have regarding the submission's potential or any other aspect related to CCDP's publishing this work.
May we call upon you to review the revised text?
Please see our Generative AI Policy. An author’s use of GenAI, when appropriate and disclosed, should not factor into a reviewer decision.
To protect author confidentiality and intellectual property, reviewers may not input any portion of sample chapters, a full manuscript, media or design elements, visuals, transcripts, code, or other content submitted to CCDP into any GenAI platform.
In an effort to ensure that reviewer feedback is based on human expertise, reviewers may not use GenAI tools for drafting reviewer comments or notes.